[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B9B559.2060400@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:24:57 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/20] ppp: slight optimization of addr compare
Hello.
On 24-12-2013 15:28, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
> to instead of memcmp.
> Cc: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...thlink.net>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> index 82ee6ed..1808a10 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> @@ -131,12 +131,13 @@ static inline struct pppoe_net *pppoe_pernet(struct net *net)
>
> static inline int cmp_2_addr(struct pppoe_addr *a, struct pppoe_addr *b)
> {
> - return a->sid == b->sid && !memcmp(a->remote, b->remote, ETH_ALEN);
> + return a->sid == b->sid && ether_addr_equal(a->remote,
> + b->remote);
If it really doesn't fit insto single line, the continuation line should
start right under 'a->remote'.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists