[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131224025059.GA24419@gchen.bj.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 21:51:00 -0500
From: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Janet Morgan <janet.morgan@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ruiv Wang <ruiv.wang@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, irq, fix logical AND/OR error in
check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:39:12AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> index 7d40698..aed7acc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
> desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> affinity = data->affinity;
> - if (irq_has_action(irq) || !irqd_is_per_cpu(data) ||
> + if (irq_has_action(irq) && !irqd_is_per_cpu(data) &&
> !cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask))
> this_count++;
Hi, Prarit
I noticed that you don't mention another question I asked in last mail.
"It looks like cpu_online_mask will be updated until cpu_disable_common
is called, but your check_vectors is called before that."
native_cpu_disable
cpu_disable_common
remove_cpu_from_maps
/*
* until here, cpu_online_mask/cpu_online_bits
* is cleared
*/
set_cpu_online(cpu, false);
Something I missed?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists