[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131225215249.GA3832@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 21:52:49 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: ben@...dawsk.net, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix refcount leak and possible NULL pointer
dereference.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 08:50:23PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >From 482be6384379072eb4c0d45d0ab8a25df4f59ed7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:04:14 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix refcount leak and possible NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Since get_pid_task() grabs a reference on the task_struct, we have to drop the
> refcount after reading that task's comm name. Also, directly reading like
> get_pid_task()->comm can trigger an oops when get_pid_task() returned NULL.
The second issue is moot as file itself cannot exist if the task_struct
is NULL, and the task_struct cannot be destroyed until we finish the
function. The simpler fix would appear to be s/get_pid_task/pid_task/
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists