[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3682408.uVrpujAYh7@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 01:56:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
jinchoi@...adcom.com,
Sebastian Capella <sebastian.capella@...aro.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: suspend/resume governors with PM notifiers
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 11:39:07 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Well, disabling it for the whole duration of suspend/resume and/or hibernation
> > > > may not be the right approach entirely, unless we force the pax perf of the
> > >
> > > s/pax/max ?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I'm not sure max frequency is a good idea. In particular, early
> athlon64 notebooks could not run on max frequency on battery power.
>
> IMO it would be good to keep governors running during hibernation.
The idea of using PM notifiers for cpufreq suspend/resume has been abandoned
already.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists