[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52BC44F1.9030205@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:02:09 -0600
From: Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: support hardware-specific debugfs entries
On 12/26/2013 08:50 AM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 08:26 -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
>>
>> @@ -140,6 +147,9 @@ struct clk_ops {
>> int (*set_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long,
>> unsigned long);
>> void (*init)(struct clk_hw *hw);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
>> + int (*debug_init)(struct clk_hw *hw, struct dentry *dentry);
>> +#endif
>> };
>
> Please note that this CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG switch may go away
> (or get replaced) soon. Mike plans to effectively enable common
> clock debugging as soon as debugfs is in effect (which I welcome
> very much).
Fine with me. I'll wait for further feedback before sending
out an updated patch. Thanks.
-Alex
>
> So you should monitor current development and adjust your patch,
> or be prepared for breakage and fixing afterwards. I'd suggest
> to just declare the .debug_init member unconditionally now.
> Since Mike's patch very likely gets accepted, and nothing will
> break when yours gets added later (regardless of the number of
> review iterations it will see).
>
>
> virtually yours
> Gerhard Sittig
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists