[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131227144504.GA17192@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:45:04 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Question about /proc/uptime
Add Frederic, I am not sure I understand this correctly.
On 12/25, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> There are two values here, the first is seconds since boot time (which
> is just elapsed time; at one point it was ajusted for suspend and that
> was revered as confusing).
Hmm, uptime_proc_show() still uses get_monotonic_boottime(), this should
include suspend time?
> The second value isn't documented but looking at fs/proc/uptime.c I
> think it's idle time?
And this cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE] doesn't match get_idle_time(), I guess
it only counts ticks.
> Except, if yo uadd up the idle time from all
> processors wouldn't you get 4x the uptime on a 4-way SMP system that's
> been idle since boot?
Yes, looks strange.
> Also, is this actual "cpu was on but not doing anything" time, so
> doesn't count suspend as idle?
I think suspend is not counted as idle.
> Confused,
I guess the 2nd value is historical, probably you should use /proc/stat.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists