[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52BF03D8.7000309@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:01:12 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32
On 12/28/2013 08:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Independent on how this fixes things, how does the kernel_long_t name
> here make any sense?
>
> On x86-64 "kernel" long always is 64 bits wide. The userspace ABI long
> might be 32 or 64bits wide.
>
> Currently kernel_long_t has almost no uses, so it might be a good time
> to fix the name, define the rules for it, and last but not least
> properly document the intent for thse types.
>
The definition is "an integer type the same width as 'long' for the
native kernel type for the ABI". If you have any suggestions for a
better name, or for that matter, a better alternative, that would be
genuinely appreciated...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists