lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:07:23 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
To:	Prarit Bhargava <>,,
	Michel Lespinasse <>,
	Seiji Aguchi <>,
	Yang Zhang <>,
	Paul Gortmaker <>,
	Janet Morgan <>,
	Tony Luck <>,
	Ruiv Wang <>,
	Andi Kleen <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, irq, fix logical AND/OR error in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()

On 12/27/2013 08:13 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> Back to my question, assume cpu1 will be off-lined and one irq affinity is
>> set as (1, 2) -- this irq will be bypassed. Looks good. But if one irq
>> affinity is set as only (1), -- this irq is bypassed, too. Not right!
> Oh, yes, this is a bug.  ... and as you point out ...

Does this mean the patch that is currently in my tree should not be
pushed to Linus?  It sounds like that to me...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists