lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1388251228-18558-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:20:28 -0500
From:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
	Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	janet.morgan@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, ruiv.wang@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86, Fix do_IRQ interrupt warning for cpu hotplug retriggered irqs [v2]

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64831

When downing a cpu it is possible that there are unhandled irqs left in
the APIC IRR register.  The following code path shows how the problem
can occur:

1. CPU 5 is to go down.
2. CPU 5 IRQ 12 IRR is set to request service, but ISR is not set.
3. cpu_disable on CPU 5 executes via stop_machine()
4. IRQs are migrated off of CPU 5, and the vectors' irqs are set to -1.
4. stop_machine() finishes cpu_disable()
5. cpu_die() for CPU 5 executes in normal context.
6. CPU 5 attempts to handle IRQ 12 because the IRR is set for IRQ 12.  The
code attempts to find the vector's IRQ and cannot because it has been set to -1.
7. do_IRQ warning displays warning about CPU 5 IRQ 12.

When this happens, do_IRQ() spits out a warning like

kernel: [  614.414443] do_IRQ: 5.124 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

I added a debug printk to output which CPU & vector was retriggered and
discovered that that we are getting bogus events.  I see a 100% correlation
between this debug printk in fixup_irqs() and the do_IRQ() warning.

This patchset resolves this by adding definitions for VECTOR_UNDEFINED(-1) and
VECTOR_RETRIGGERED(-2) and modifying the code to use them.

[v2]: sent with more detailed commit message

Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: janet.morgan@...el.com
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: ruiv.wang@...il.com
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h  |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |   13 +++++++------
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c          |   17 +++++++++++------
 arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c      |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 92b3bae..22c425e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ extern __visible void smp_invalidate_interrupt(struct pt_regs *);
 
 extern void (*__initconst interrupt[NR_VECTORS-FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR])(void);
 
+#define VECTOR_UNDEFINED	-1
+#define VECTOR_RETRIGGERED	-2
 typedef int vector_irq_t[NR_VECTORS];
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(vector_irq_t, vector_irq);
 extern void setup_vector_irq(int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index e63a5bd..6e1541c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1143,7 +1143,8 @@ next:
 			goto next;
 
 		for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask)
-			if (per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] != -1)
+			if (per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] >
+							      VECTOR_UNDEFINED)
 				goto next;
 		/* Found one! */
 		current_vector = vector;
@@ -1183,7 +1184,7 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 
 	vector = cfg->vector;
 	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cfg->domain, cpu_online_mask)
-		per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
+		per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = VECTOR_UNDEFINED;
 
 	cfg->vector = 0;
 	cpumask_clear(cfg->domain);
@@ -1195,7 +1196,7 @@ static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 								vector++) {
 			if (per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] != irq)
 				continue;
-			per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
+			per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = VECTOR_UNDEFINED;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
@@ -1228,12 +1229,12 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
 	/* Mark the free vectors */
 	for (vector = 0; vector < NR_VECTORS; ++vector) {
 		irq = per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector];
-		if (irq < 0)
+		if (irq <= VECTOR_UNDEFINED)
 			continue;
 
 		cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cfg->domain))
-			per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
+			per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = VECTOR_UNDEFINED;
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
 }
@@ -2208,7 +2209,7 @@ asmlinkage void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(void)
 		struct irq_cfg *cfg;
 		irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
 
-		if (irq == -1)
+		if (irq <= VECTOR_UNDEFINED)
 			continue;
 
 		desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 22d0687..030f0e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -193,9 +193,10 @@ __visible unsigned int __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!handle_irq(irq, regs)) {
 		ack_APIC_irq();
 
-		if (printk_ratelimit())
-			pr_emerg("%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector (irq %d)\n",
-				__func__, smp_processor_id(), vector, irq);
+		if (irq != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED)
+			pr_emerg_ratelimited("%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector (irq %d)\n",
+					     __func__, smp_processor_id(),
+					     vector, irq);
 	}
 
 	irq_exit();
@@ -344,7 +345,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 	for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
 		unsigned int irr;
 
-		if (__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]) < 0)
+		if (__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]) <= VECTOR_UNDEFINED)
 			continue;
 
 		irr = apic_read(APIC_IRR + (vector / 32 * 0x10));
@@ -355,11 +356,15 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 			data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
 			chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
 			raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
-			if (chip->irq_retrigger)
+			if (chip->irq_retrigger) {
 				chip->irq_retrigger(data);
+				__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector],
+						 VECTOR_RETRIGGERED);
+			}
 			raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
 		}
-		__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], -1);
+		if (__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]) != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED)
+			__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNDEFINED);
 	}
 }
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
index a2a1fbc..7f50156 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static struct irqaction irq2 = {
 };
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(vector_irq_t, vector_irq) = {
-	[0 ... NR_VECTORS - 1] = -1,
+	[0 ... NR_VECTORS - 1] = VECTOR_UNDEFINED,
 };
 
 int vector_used_by_percpu_irq(unsigned int vector)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int vector_used_by_percpu_irq(unsigned int vector)
 	int cpu;
 
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] != -1)
+		if (per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] > VECTOR_UNDEFINED)
 			return 1;
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ