[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1388282923.134503117@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 03:08:43 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Paul Moore" <pmoore@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 001/185] selinux: correct locking in selinux_netlbl_socket_connect)
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
commit 42d64e1add3a1ce8a787116036163b8724362145 upstream.
The SELinux/NetLabel glue code has a locking bug that affects systems
with NetLabel enabled, see the kernel error message below. This patch
corrects this problem by converting the bottom half socket lock to a
more conventional, and correct for this call-path, lock_sock() call.
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
3.11.0-rc3+ #19 Not tainted
-------------------------------
net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1928 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
2 locks held by ping/731:
#0: (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-...}, at: [...] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect
#1: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<...>] netlbl_conn_setattr
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 731 Comm: ping Not tainted 3.11.0-rc3+ #19
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
0000000000000001 ffff88006f659d28 ffffffff81726b6a ffff88003732c500
ffff88006f659d58 ffffffff810e4457 ffff88006b845a00 0000000000000000
000000000000000c ffff880075aa2f50 ffff88006f659d90 ffffffff8169bec7
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81726b6a>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
[<ffffffff810e4457>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[<ffffffff8169bec7>] cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x187/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8170f317>] netlbl_conn_setattr+0x187/0x190
[<ffffffff8170f195>] ? netlbl_conn_setattr+0x5/0x190
[<ffffffff8131ac9e>] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect+0xae/0xc0
[<ffffffff81303025>] selinux_socket_connect+0x135/0x170
[<ffffffff8119d127>] ? might_fault+0x57/0xb0
[<ffffffff812fb146>] security_socket_connect+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff815d3ad3>] SYSC_connect+0x73/0x130
[<ffffffff81739a85>] ? sysret_check+0x22/0x5d
[<ffffffff810e5e2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81373d4e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff815d52be>] SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff81739a59>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
security/selinux/netlabel.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/security/selinux/netlabel.c
+++ b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
@@ -442,8 +442,7 @@ int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect(struct
sksec->nlbl_state != NLBL_CONNLABELED)
return 0;
- local_bh_disable();
- bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
+ lock_sock(sk);
/* connected sockets are allowed to disconnect when the address family
* is set to AF_UNSPEC, if that is what is happening we want to reset
@@ -464,7 +463,6 @@ int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect(struct
sksec->nlbl_state = NLBL_CONNLABELED;
socket_connect_return:
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
- local_bh_enable();
+ release_sock(sk);
return rc;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists