[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131229014428.GA6041@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 02:44:29 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Gene Heskett <gheskett@...v.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: amd microcode broken by 3.12.0?
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:37:12AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Fresh build/boot of a PAE 3.12.0 on an AMD Phenom...
>
> On checking dmesg, I see:
>
> microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x01000065
> microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x01000065
> microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x01000065
> microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x01000065
> microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>,
> Peter Oruba
>
> Fairly late since I don't have early microcode checked in the .config.
I have a bunch of fixes for that:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138628638215162
wanna give them a try?
> FWIW, it didn't work when I had it checked either.
>
> While booted to much older kernels, it reports that each cpu has been
> brought up to patch level 0x01000083
>
> So, stepping into /etc/init.d and doing a "sudo ./microcode_ctl", this is
> returned:
>
> ./microcode_ctl: 90: gprintf: not found
>
> Which has me scratching my head, wondering if my .config is screwed?
I don't think we ever did microcode update with the microcode_ctl on
AMD, did we? Hmmm.
In any case
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload
should work.
HTH.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists