linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb5a2c1a-7bca-494a-bbd0-704f93902ec9@email.android.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:40:45 +0100
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume

Yes, that's good. As you might have guessed by the lack of any response, I won't be able to test this in 2013.

Thanks for all the good work!


Bjørn 

Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>On 27 December 2013 15:27, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>wrote:
>> I think there is nothing much different in this patch compared to
>what Bjorn
>> tested. So you can probably push that now and let him test linux-next
>later
>> once he is back?
>
>Just saw that you already pushed it. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/