[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1388376508.5345.23.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 05:08:28 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, leiwen@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: update rq clock when only get preempt
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:14 +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> Since we would update rq clock at task enqueue/dequeue, or schedule
> tick. If we don't update the rq clock when our previous task get
> preempted, our new started task would get a relative stale rq clock
> which is updated during the previous task enqueue, or the last schedule
> clock update.
> @@ -2555,6 +2556,8 @@ need_resched:
> idle_balance(cpu, rq);
>
> put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> + if (update)
> + update_rq_clock(rq);
If prev remained enqueued, the clock was updated by put_prev_task().
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists