[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:11:23 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: generic: add generic compound card
with DT support
On 01/01/2014 09:08 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 20:05:05 +0100
> Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
>
>> As Mark also said, this binding definitely leaks way too much internals of
>> the current ASoC implementation. In my opinion the way forward for ASoC is
>> to stop to distinguish between different types of components. This is on one
>> hand CODECS and CPU-DAIs and on the other hand also front-end and beck-end
>> DAIs. The first steps in this direction have already been take by the start
>> of the component-fication, but its still a long way to go. Exposing those
>> concepts via the devicetree will only make it harder to get rid of them
>> later. The bindings for a compound card should essentially describe which
>> components are involved and how the fabric between and around them looks
>> like. If the type of the component is needed in the ASoC implementation it
>> should be possible to auto-discover it. Also I think we want to align the
>> devicetree bindings with what the media people have been doing[1].
>
> (you forgot the [1] reference)
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists