linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 1/7] bonding: use ether_addr_equal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C52AAD.8040603@huawei.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:00:29 +0800
From:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 1/7] bonding: use ether_addr_equal_unaligned
 for bond addr compare

On 2014/1/2 16:38, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> 
>> On 2014/1/2 15:39, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> Are the casts needed
>>
>>
>> Yes, otherwise the warming will report:
>>
>> /net-next/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c:427: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘ether_addr_equal_64bits’ from incompatible pointer type
> 
> Is it necessary for this driver to use a different type from everyone 
> else?
> 
> julia
> 
Did you mean the MAC_ADDRESS_EQUAL is excess?
I did not remove it because the codes no need to be changed more and it looks that didn't take any negative effect.

Regards
Ding


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/