[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140102101455.GG10158@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:14:55 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: v3.13-rc6+ regression (ARM board)
Hello Krzysztof,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:02:44AM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> >> There seems to be a regression in v3.13-rc6+ (up to current tip =
> >> 71ce176ee6ed1735b9a1160a5704a915d13849b1).
> >>
> >> Board is Gateworks Cambria, CPU Intel IXP435 ARM big endian, gcc 4.7.3.
> >> The board boots correctly and works (shell mostly, and SSHD) for about
> >> 50 seconds. After 52-54 seconds, it frozes dead without any console
> >> (UART) output.
> >>
> >> Bisecting shows 5e30025a319910695f5010dc0fb53a23299da14d as the first
> >> bad commit. Interestingly it's a merge:
>
> Reverting 1ca7d67cf5d5a2aef26a8d9afd789006fa098347 on top of current tip
> (9a0bb2966efbf30a71c128c3af63307d8b5f5fc0) fixes my issue.
>
> What now?
>
> 1ca7d67cf5d5a2aef26a8d9afd789006fa098347:
> seqcount: Add lockdep functionality to seqcount/seqlock structures
>
> Currently seqlocks and seqcounts don't support lockdep.
>
> After running across a seqcount related deadlock in the timekeeping
> code, I used a less-refined and more focused variant of this patch
> to narrow down the cause of the issue.
>
> This is a first-pass attempt to properly enable lockdep functionality
> on seqlocks and seqcounts.
>
> Since seqcounts are used in the vdso gettimeofday code, I've provided
> non-lockdep accessors for those needs.
>
> I've also handled one case where there were nested seqlock writers
> and there may be more edge cases.
>
> Comments and feedback would be appreciated!
So it seems to be that 1ca7d67cf5d5a2aef26a8d9afd789006fa098347 doesn't
like to be combined with some other commit from
5e30025a319910695f5010dc0fb53a23299da14d^2..5e30025a319910695f5010dc0fb53a23299da14d^.
What you can do is:
git bisect start 5e30025a319910695f5010dc0fb53a23299da14d^ b8a216269ec0ce2e961d32e6d640d7010b8a818e
The bad commit is the tip of Linus' tree when he created the bad merge
commit. The good one is the base of the merged tree. To check if a tree
is good or bad do:
git merge --no-commit 5e30025a319910695f5010dc0fb53a23299da14d^2
test test test
git reset --hard
git bisect good ... or ... git bisect bad
That should find the commit that makes your board break in combination
with 1ca7d67cf5d5a2aef26a8d9afd789006fa098347.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists