[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C56F43.6030804@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:53:07 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 26/38] xen: xenbus: add missing put_device
call
On 19/12/13 15:03, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> This is required so that we give up the last reference to the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> index 3c0a74b..4abb9ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> @@ -465,8 +465,10 @@ int xenbus_probe_node(struct xen_bus_type *bus,
>
> /* Register with generic device framework. */
> err = device_register(&xendev->dev);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> + put_device(&xendev->dev);
> goto fail;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> fail:
There is a kfree(xendev) here so this introduces a double-free.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists