[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C59483.5030607@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:32:03 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 15/18] xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM for grant driver
(v2)
On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> In PVH the shared grant frame is the PFN and not MFN,
> hence its mapped via the same code path as HVM.
>
> The allocation of the grant frame is done differently - we
> do not use the early platform-pci driver and have an
> ioremap area - instead we use balloon memory and stitch
> all of the non-contingous pages in a virtualized area.
>
> That means when we call the hypervisor to replace the GMFN
> with a XENMAPSPACE_grant_table type, we need to lookup the
> old PFN for every iteration instead of assuming a flat
> contingous PFN allocation.
>
> Lastly, we only use v1 for grants. This is because PVHVM
> is not able to use v2 due to no XENMEM_add_to_physmap
> calls on the error status page (see commit
> 69e8f430e243d657c2053f097efebc2e2cd559f0
> xen/granttable: Disable grant v2 for HVM domains.)
>
> Until that is implemented this workaround has to
> be in place.
>
> Also per suggestions by Stefano utilize the PVHVM paths
> as they share common functionality.
>
> v2 of this patch moves most of the PVH code out in the
> arch/x86/xen/grant-table driver and touches only minimally
> the generic driver.
[...]
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/grant-table.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/grant-table.c
[...]
> +static int __init xen_pvh_gnttab_setup(void)
> +{
> + if (!xen_domain())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!xen_pv_domain())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> + return -ENODEV;
Replace all these with if (!xen_pvh_domain()) ?
> @@ -1320,4 +1323,4 @@ static int __gnttab_init(void)
> return gnttab_init();
> }
>
> -core_initcall(__gnttab_init);
> +core_initcall_sync(__gnttab_init);
Why has this become _sync?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists