linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.8 64/91] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1388682306-30859-65-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  2 Jan 2014 09:04:39 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.8 64/91] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value

3.8.13.15 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>

commit 2fea6cd303c0d0cd9067da31d873b6a6d5bd75e7 upstream.

This patch fixes the issue that the sja1000_interrupt() function may have
returned IRQ_NONE without processing the optional pre_irq() and post_irq()
function before. Further the irq processing counter 'n' is moved to the end of
the while statement to return correct IRQ_[NONE|HANDLED] values at error
conditions.

Reported-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
[ kamal: backport to 3.8 (renamed constant) ]
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
index 43921f9..8eb5a32 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
@@ -490,19 +490,19 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	uint8_t isrc, status;
 	int n = 0;
 
+	if (priv->pre_irq)
+		priv->pre_irq(priv);
+
 	/* Shared interrupts and IRQ off? */
 	if (priv->read_reg(priv, REG_IER) == IRQ_OFF)
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 
-	if (priv->pre_irq)
-		priv->pre_irq(priv);
-
 	while ((isrc = priv->read_reg(priv, REG_IR)) && (n < SJA1000_MAX_IRQ)) {
-		n++;
+
 		status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_REG_SR);
 		/* check for absent controller due to hw unplug */
 		if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
-			return IRQ_NONE;
+			goto out;
 
 		if (isrc & IRQ_WUI)
 			netdev_warn(dev, "wakeup interrupt\n");
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 				status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_REG_SR);
 				/* check for absent controller */
 				if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
-					return IRQ_NONE;
+					goto out;
 			}
 		}
 		if (isrc & (IRQ_DOI | IRQ_EI | IRQ_BEI | IRQ_EPI | IRQ_ALI)) {
@@ -537,8 +537,9 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 			if (sja1000_err(dev, isrc, status))
 				break;
 		}
+		n++;
 	}
-
+out:
 	if (priv->post_irq)
 		priv->post_irq(priv);
 
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/