linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: Remove deprecated IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C5B52E.6080609@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:51:26 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	olof@...om.net, khilman@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] ARM: spear: Remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED flag

On 01/02/2014 07:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 30 December 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This flag is a NOOP and scheduled to be removed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks for sending this series. I think the patches are duplicates of stuff that
> Michael Opdenacker has sent before (actually multiple times). I have no problem
> applying either version into arm-soc, but I think it would be better to attribute
> them to Michael, since he came first. Can you two please coordinate and send a
> single pull request for the arm-soc related patches that haven't made it into
> linux-next yet?

Michael removed the flag for:

pxa (ed7936f913456e4c01aed75deba6cfaf830fa8cf)
samsung (fa53d5cdbffbce421c3bd2f937b5626fc044fedc)
avr32 (7155530d9eb692994d208836e4965da06b17c99d)
ep93xx (3a71ae4796fdaedbdbdab94660b7b7b5bfe61d1d)
plat-orion (eb4d552b933ac59c0c8e0604ff435c5208a82679)

The patchset I sent is on top of arm/for-next and finishes to remove 
this flag for arch/arm. It should not overlap with what Michael did.

I'm ok to attribute the patchset to Michael if that can help to accept 
this patchset and kill this flag for arch/arm.

Thanks
   -- Daniel


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/