[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyZ0EXYkHd-BhQo6K++qKJVPdGeDbFTVTs3pAPCHFUpOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:38:56 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: v3.13-rc6+ regression (ARM board)
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl> wrote:
>
> This means these two commits don't like each other:
>
>     seqcount: Add lockdep functionality to seqcount/seqlock structures
>     sched_clock: Use seqcount instead of rolling our own
Does something like this fix it for you?
  --- a/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
  +++ b/kernel/time/sched_clock.c
  @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ core_param(irqtime, irqtime, int, 0400);
   static struct clock_data cd = {
          .mult   = NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ,
  +       .seq = SEQCNT_ZERO(cd.seq),
   };
   static u64 __read_mostly sched_clock_mask;
(The above is not even compile-tested, because x86 doesn't use
GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK. So I did the patch blindly, but I think you get
the idea..)
            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
