linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C5D69C.2030104@sr71.net>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:14:04 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

On 01/02/2014 01:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> > +config HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP
>> > +	bool
>> > +
>> > +config SECCOMP
>> > +	bool
> 
> I haven't looked at the other 'CONFIG_HAVE' options, but shouldn't
> 'HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP' be dependent on 'SECCOMP'?

Ahh, you're backwards, but right. :)

I forgot to make sure that SECCOMP depends on the architecture option
being set.  Fixed patch is attached.

View attachment "consolidate-seccomp-options.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (13717 bytes)