[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103041237.GA4506@dhcp-16-198.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:12:37 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, hpa@...or.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, bp@...en8.de, greg@...ah.com,
toshi.kani@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
msalter@...hat.com, leif.lindholm@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] kexec kernel efi runtime support
> Please send these as separate patches and include the compiler errors in
> the commit message. I'll pick them up and send them to Peter.
Sent.
>
> > build fix: move parse_efi_setup to efi*.c, call it in efi_init instead in setup.c
>
> Why have you moved the call site for parse_efi_setup()? What's the
> rationale? Parsing SETUP_* entries outside of parse_setup_data() seems
> to me to be a step backwards in terms of clarity.
SETUP_PCI also duplicate the parsing logic out of setup.c.
I added static inline in ifdef else branch, but I got some warnings yestoday
about "unused function", double checked it today there's no such warnings
anymore, it might be caused by some mistake.
Changed to static inline {} in patches I just sent a moment ago.
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists