[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103053817.GA3403@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:38:17 -0800
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] r8152: fix the wrong return value
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:21:56AM +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
> The return value should be the boolean value, not the error code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
> Spotted-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index e3d878c..13fabbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> @@ -2708,7 +2708,7 @@ static bool rtl_ops_init(struct r8152 *tp, const struct usb_device_id *id)
> ops->unload = rtl8153_unload;
> break;
> default:
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> + ret = false;
How about fix the function's return type instead?
Returning bool for success/error in Linux kernel is not natural. You
gotta check rtl_ops_init() for success and !rtl_ops_init() for error.
And you are unable to return the error value.
Br, David
> break;
> }
> break;
> --
> 1.8.4.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists