lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1388728091-18564-6-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Date:	Fri,  3 Jan 2014 13:48:02 +0800
From:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...nel.org, acme@...radead.org,
	eranian@...gle.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/14] perf, core: allow pmu specific data for perf task context

Later patches will use pmu specific data to save LBR stack.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  5 +++++
 kernel/events/core.c       | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 96cb88b..147f9d3 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -252,6 +252,10 @@ struct pmu {
 	 */
 	void (*sched_task)		(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
 					 bool sched_in);
+	/*
+	 * PMU specific data size
+	 */
+	size_t				task_ctx_size;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -496,6 +500,7 @@ struct perf_event_context {
 	int				pin_count;
 	int				nr_cgroups;	 /* cgroup evts */
 	int				nr_branch_stack; /* branch_stack evt */
+	void				*task_ctx_data; /* pmu specific data */
 	struct rcu_head			rcu_head;
 };
 
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index aba4d6d..b6650ab 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -883,6 +883,15 @@ static void get_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 	WARN_ON(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ctx->refcount));
 }
 
+static void free_ctx(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct perf_event_context *ctx;
+
+	ctx = container_of(head, struct perf_event_context, rcu_head);
+	kfree(ctx->task_ctx_data);
+	kfree(ctx);
+}
+
 static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 {
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->refcount)) {
@@ -890,7 +899,7 @@ static void put_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
 			put_ctx(ctx->parent_ctx);
 		if (ctx->task)
 			put_task_struct(ctx->task);
-		kfree_rcu(ctx, rcu_head);
+		call_rcu(&ctx->rcu_head, free_ctx);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3020,6 +3029,14 @@ alloc_perf_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct task_struct *task)
 	if (!ctx)
 		return NULL;
 
+	if (task && pmu->task_ctx_size > 0) {
+		ctx->task_ctx_data = kzalloc(pmu->task_ctx_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!ctx->task_ctx_data) {
+			kfree(ctx);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+	}
+
 	__perf_event_init_context(ctx);
 	if (task) {
 		ctx->task = task;
-- 
1.8.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ