[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871u0po0gx.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:53:34 +0100
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> writes:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> writes:
>
>> OK, thanks! Well, this is somewhat worrisome.
>>
>> Could you also check the linux-pm.git/fixes branch that contains all patches
>> I'm planning to push for 3.13-rc7 shortly?
>
> It's definitely still there. But I'm less sure about the exact trigger.
I did a couple of more tests after clean reboots, and 100% sure ways to
trigger the circular locking on my laptop are
echo ondemand > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
s2disk
or
echo 1401000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
s2disk
or
echo 1401000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
s2disk
Note that "ondemand" and "1401000" are the default vaules, so I don't
actually change anything here. The write is causing the problem, not
the value. As expected, I guess.
Also note that boot vs non-boot cpu doesn't seem to matter. Nor does
cancelling the hibernation. The warning appears on hibernate - not on
resume.
Hope this helps.
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists