[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C694BF.3020903@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:45:19 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@...wei.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: edumazet@...gle.com, kaber@...sh.net, peterz@...radead.org,
honkiko@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] veth: backup classid befor switch net_ns
Hello.
On 03-01-2014 7:11, Libo Chen wrote:
> dev_forward_skb will clear skb->sk, so we need save classid
> before that, otherwise the skb can not be under control by
> net_cls.
> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/veth.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> index 2ec2041..ce43a2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
[...]
> @@ -123,6 +124,12 @@ static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>
> + /**
Why you're using kernel-doc style comments out of place? The format of
multi-line comments in the networking code is this:
/* bla
* bla
*/
> + * dev_forward_sbk will clear skb->sk, so save
> + * skb->sk->sk_classid for Qos
> + */
> + bk_cls_classid(skb);
> +
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists