[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103132425.GC1190@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:24:25 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tools lib traceevent: Add state member to struct
trace_seq
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:34:23PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>
> The trace_seq->state is for tracking errors during the use of
> trace_seq APIs and getting rid of die() in it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h | 7 +++++++
> tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h
> index cf5db9013f2c..3c890cb28db7 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ struct pevent_record {
> #endif
> };
>
> +enum trace_seq_fail {
> + TRACE_SEQ__GOOD,
> + TRACE_SEQ__BUFFER_POISONED,
> + TRACE_SEQ__MEM_ALLOC_FAILED,
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Trace sequences are used to allow a function to call several other functions
> * to create a string of data to use (up to a max of PAGE_SIZE).
> @@ -68,6 +74,7 @@ struct trace_seq {
> unsigned int buffer_size;
> unsigned int len;
> unsigned int readpos;
> + enum trace_seq_fail state;
> };
>
> void trace_seq_init(struct trace_seq *s);
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
> index d7f2e68bc5b9..976ad2a146b3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
> #define TRACE_SEQ_POISON ((void *)0xdeadbeef)
> #define TRACE_SEQ_CHECK(s) \
> do { \
> - if ((s)->buffer == TRACE_SEQ_POISON) \
> - die("Usage of trace_seq after it was destroyed"); \
> + if ((s)->buffer == TRACE_SEQ_POISON) \
> + (s)->state = TRACE_SEQ__BUFFER_POISONED; \
So unless we use trace_seq_do_printf we dont have any
notification that this went wrong..?
How about use some sort of WARN_ONCE any time the state
is set != GOOD ?
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists