linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 17/18] xen/pvh/arm/arm64: Disable PV code that does not work with PVH (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140103175949.GA28551@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:59:49 -0500
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	mukesh.rathor@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 17/18] xen/pvh/arm/arm64: Disable PV code that does
 not work with PVH (v2)

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:22:01PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
> > 
> > As we do not have yet a mechanism for that.
> > 
> > This also impacts the ARM/ARM64 code (which does not have
> > hotplug support yet).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
> > index cc6513a..5f80802 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include <xen/xen.h>
> >  #include <xen/xenbus.h>
> > +#include <xen/features.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> >  #include <asm/cpu.h>
> > @@ -102,7 +103,8 @@ static int __init setup_vcpu_hotplug_event(void)
> >  	static struct notifier_block xsn_cpu = {
> >  		.notifier_call = setup_cpu_watcher };
> >  
> > -	if (!xen_pv_domain())
> > +	/* PVH/ARM/ARM64 TBD/FIXME: future work */
> > +	if (!xen_pv_domain() || xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  
> >  	register_xenstore_notifier(&xsn_cpu);
> 
> Sorry for being a bit obnoxious but I was thinking that using a
> xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap) check is conceptually
> wrong, because cpu hotplug and nested paging are orthogonal.

Yeah, you should be sorry :-) (Just joking - appreciate your
input and review)
> 
> Given that we most probably want to follow the PV path for cpu_hotplug
> (that is using drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c), is there actually a problem
> with building and initializing it on PVH guests?

It hasn't been tested..

> If it works as it is, I would be tempted to leave it for now.

..until now and it actually looks to work.

> 
> Otherwise the patch is OK and you can add my Acked-by.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/