[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxv8wTRifZ9iHn-tCfUqwpJZmLiF7QU=Pc6dVa8QnTyCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:50:50 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> enabled seqcount methods.
>
> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
tree, which is where the problem came from. No?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists