[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002d01cf0821$8ee66300$acb32900$@lge.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:17:23 +0900
From: "Hyeoncheol Lee" <cheol.lee@....com>
To: "'Steven Rostedt'" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "'Namhyung Kim'" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"'Oleg Nesterov'" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"'Masami Hiramatsu'" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"'Srikar Dronamraju'" <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"'zhangwei\(Jovi\)'" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
"'Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo'" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"'Hemant Kumar'" <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Namhyung Kim'" <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 15/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for full argument access methods
Patches look good to me.
Signed-off-by: Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@...dmis.org]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 6:02 AM
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Namhyung Kim; Oleg Nesterov; Masami Hiramatsu; Srikar Dronamraju;
Hyeoncheol Lee; zhangwei(Jovi); Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; Hemant Kumar;
LKML; Namhyung Kim
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for full argument
access methods
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:58:27 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:14 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
> >
> > Enable to fetch other types of argument for the uprobes. IOW, we
> > can access stack, memory, deref, bitfield and retval from uprobes now.
> >
> > The format for the argument types are same as kprobes (but @SYMBOL
> > type is not supported for uprobes), i.e:
> >
> > @ADDR : Fetch memory at ADDR
> > $stackN : Fetch Nth entry of stack (N >= 0)
> > $stack : Fetch stack address
> > $retval : Fetch return value
> > +|-offs(FETCHARG) : Fetch memory at FETCHARG +|- offs address
> >
> > Note that the retval only can be used with uretprobes.
> >
> > Original-patch-by: Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
>
> Where was the original patch posted? And can we get Hyeoncheol's SOB
> for this?
>
Was this the other part of patch 11? Still should have Hyeoncheol's
signed-off-by. If you already had it on the original (before the split) then
we can add it here too, as he already signed off on the code that this was
based on.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists