linux-kernel - [tip:x86/build] x86, sparse: Do not force removal of __user when calling copy_to/from_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-df90ca969035d3f6c95044e272f75bf417b14245@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:04:09 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Steven Rostedt <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/build] x86, sparse:
  Do not force removal of __user when calling copy_to/from_user_nocheck()

Commit-ID:  df90ca969035d3f6c95044e272f75bf417b14245
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/df90ca969035d3f6c95044e272f75bf417b14245
Author:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:45:00 -0500
Committer:  H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 13:54:50 -0800

x86, sparse: Do not force removal of __user when calling copy_to/from_user_nocheck()

Commit ff47ab4ff3cdd "x86: Add 1/2/4/8 byte optimization to 64bit
__copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic" added a "_nocheck" call in between
the copy_to/from_user() and copy_user_generic(). As both the
normal and nocheck versions of theses calls use the proper __user
annotation, a typecast to remove it should not be added.
This causes sparse to spin out the following warnings:

arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*src
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    got void const *<noident>
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*src
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    got void const *<noident>
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*src
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    got void const *<noident>
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*src
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:207:47:    got void const *<noident>

Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140103164500.5f6478f5@gandalf.local.home
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 190413d..12a26b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 static __must_check __always_inline int
 __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
 {
-	return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
+	return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
 }
 
 static __must_check __always_inline int
 __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
 {
-	return __copy_to_user_nocheck((__force void *)dst, src, size);
+	return __copy_to_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
 }
 
 extern long __copy_user_nocache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/