[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103172337.1e077e56@mantra.us.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:23:37 -0800
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 10/18] xen/pvh: Update E820 to work with PVH (v2)
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:41:34 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:14:32PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> > On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
> > >
> > > In xen_add_extra_mem() we can skip updating P2M as it's managed
> > > by Xen. PVH maps the entire IO space, but only RAM pages need
> > > to be repopulated.
> >
> > So this looks minimal but I can't work out what PVH actually needs
> > to do here. This code really doesn't need to be made any more
> > confusing.
>
> I gather you prefer Mukesh's original version?
I think Konrad thats easier to follow as one can quickly spot
the PVH difference... but your call.
thanks
mukesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists