[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140104073143.GA5594@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 07:31:43 +0000
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3 00/11] Intermix Lowmem and vmalloc
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 1/3/2014 10:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >On 01/02/2014 01:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>The goal here is to allow as much lowmem to be mapped as if the block of memory
> >>was not reserved from the physical lowmem region. Previously, we had been
> >>hacking up the direct virt <-> phys translation to ignore a large region of
> >>memory. This did not scale for multiple holes of memory however.
> >
> >How much lowmem do these holes end up eating up in practice, ballpark?
> >I'm curious how painful this is going to get.
> >
>
> In total, the worst case can be close to 100M with an average case
> around 70M-80M. The split and number of holes vary with the layout
> but end up with 60M-80M one hole and the rest in the other.
One more thing I'd like to know is how bad direct virt <->phys tranlsation
in scale POV and how often virt<->phys tranlsation is called in your worload
so what's the gain from this patch?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists