[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3d9591f81e62a78a726721c8052b3910870db35e.1388952061.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:36:32 +0100
From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 5/7] fanotify: enable close-on-exec on events' fd when requested in fanotify_init()
According to commit 80af258867648, file descriptor created as part
of file access notification events inherit flags from the event_f_flags
argument passed to syscall fanotify_init(2).
So while it is legal for userspace to call fanotify_init() with O_CLOEXEC
as part of its second argument, O_CLOEXEC is currently silently ignored.
Indeed event_f_flags are only given to dentry_open(), which only
seems to care about O_ACCMODE and O_PATH in do_dentry_open(), O_DIRECT
in open_check_o_direct() and O_LARGEFILE in generic_file_open().
More, there's no effective check on event_f_flags value that would
catch unknown / unsupported values, unlike the one on f_flags argument
of the syscall (see FAN_ALL_INIT_FLAGS in include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h).
Reading article "Botching up ioctls"[1] by Daniel Vetter might make one
feel uncomfortable when trying to add extension to an API that doesn't
check for unrecognized values.
But it seems logical to set close-on-exec flag on the file descriptor
if userspace is allowed to request it with O_CLOEXEC.
In fact, according to some lookup on http://codesearch.debian.net/ and
various search engine, there's already some userspace code requesting it:
- in systemd's readahead[2]:
fanotify_fd = fanotify_init(FAN_CLOEXEC|FAN_NONBLOCK, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC|O_NOATIME);
- in clsync[3]:
#define FANOTIFY_EVFLAGS (O_LARGEFILE|O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC)
int fanotify_d = fanotify_init(FANOTIFY_FLAGS, FANOTIFY_EVFLAGS);
- in examples [4] from "Filesystem monitoring in the Linux kernel"
article[5] by Aleksander Morgado:
if ((fanotify_fd = fanotify_init (FAN_CLOEXEC,
O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC | O_LARGEFILE)) < 0)
Lookup also returned some wrong usage of the syscall:
- in Gonk HAL from Mozilla Firefox OS sources[6]:
mFd = fanotify_init(FAN_CLASS_NOTIF, FAN_CLOEXEC);
Adding support for O_CLOEXEC in fanotify won't magically enable it for
Gonk since FAN_CLOEXEC is defined as 0x1, which is likely equal to
O_WRONLY when used in open flag context. In the other hand, it won't
hurt it either.
So this patch replaces call to macro get_unused_fd() by a call to
function get_unused_fd_flags() with event_f_flags value as argument.
This way O_CLOEXEC flag in the second argument of fanotify_init(2)
syscall is interpreted so that close-on-exec get enabled.
[1] http://blog.ffwll.ch/2013/11/botching-up-ioctls.html
[2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/readahead/readahead-collect.c?id=v208#n294
[3] https://github.com/xaionaro/clsync/blob/v0.2.1/sync.c#L1631
https://github.com/xaionaro/clsync/blob/v0.2.1/configuration.h#L38
[4] http://www.lanedo.com/~aleksander/fanotify/fanotify-example.c
[5] http://www.lanedo.com/2013/filesystem-monitoring-linux-kernel/
[6] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/325c74addeba/hal/gonk/GonkDiskSpaceWatcher.cpp#l167
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1388952061.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
---
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index 57d7c083cb4b..6d0eaabba02e 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int create_fd(struct fsnotify_group *group,
pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event);
- client_fd = get_unused_fd();
+ client_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(group->fanotify_data.f_flags);
if (client_fd < 0)
return client_fd;
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists