linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kobject: provide kobject_put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140105222356.GA22084@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:23:56 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: provide kobject_put_wait to fix module unload
 race

On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 05:04:31PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 03:35:39PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 01:06:01PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > > 
> > > > > I noticed that Jeff Mahoney added a new structure kobj_completion, defined 
> > > > > in include/linux/kobj_completion.h to the kernel 3.13-rc1 in the patch 
> > > > > eee031649707db3c9920d9498f8d03819b74fc23. In the current upstream kernel, 
> > > > > this interface is still unused.
> > > > 
> > > > There are pending btrfs patches to use this interface.
> > > > 
> > > > > However, converting the drivers to use kobj_completion is not trivial 
> > > > > (note that all users of the original kobject interface are buggy - so all 
> > > > > of them need to be converted).
> > > > 
> > > > Wait, what?  How are "all users" buggy?  Please explain this in detail.
> > > 
> > > 1) some code takes a reference to a kobject
> > > 2) the user unloads the device
> > > 3) the device driver unload routine calls kobject_put (but there is still 
> > >    reference, so the kobject is not destroyed)
> > 
> > A driver should never be messing around with "raw" kobjects, they should
> > be using a 'struct device' which is created/managed by the subsystem
> > they belong to.  See Dmitry's example of input and serio as ways to do
> > this, also USB and PCI do this properly.
> > 
> > Perhaps your sybsystem isn't doing this properly?  What code do you have
> > that creates raw kobjects and has this problem?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> So, are you saying that a module shouldn't ever be able to create a 
> kobject type?
> 
> Do "grep -rw kobj_type drivers/ fs/* net/bridge/" to see how much code 
> uses kobjects. There are 77 line. Majority of them may be compiled as 
> modules.
> 
> What do you want to do with all those kobject users? Hide them behind 
> another interface that doesn't exists yet?

Most of them should be using the driver/device interface to sysfs (the
drivers/* files, with the exception of the driver core code).  I'll look
at the others later.

And note, as module unloading can only happen by the root user, and
never happens "automatically", this is an issue, but a very minor one,
and can usually be solved by having a central "place" that handles the
kobject lifetimes.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/