[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140105034823.GE22595@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:48:23 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: provide kobject_put_wait to fix module unload
race
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 01:14:14PM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 1/4/14, 1:06 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I noticed that Jeff Mahoney added a new structure kobj_completion, defined
> > in include/linux/kobj_completion.h to the kernel 3.13-rc1 in the patch
> > eee031649707db3c9920d9498f8d03819b74fc23. In the current upstream kernel,
> > this interface is still unused.
> >
> > However, converting the drivers to use kobj_completion is not trivial
> > (note that all users of the original kobject interface are buggy - so all
> > of them need to be converted).
> >
> > I came up with a simpler patch to achieve the same purpose - this patch
> > makes fixing the drivers easy - the driver is fixed just by replacing
> > "kobject_put" with "kobject_put_wait" in the unload routine.
> >
> > I'd like to ask if you could revert
> > eee031649707db3c9920d9498f8d03819b74fc23 (no code uses it) and replace it
> > with this patch.
>
> I have no objections to reverting it. There were concerns from Al Viro
> that it'd be tough to get right by callers and I had assumed it got
> dropped after that. I had planned on using it in my btrfs sysfs exports
> patchset but came up with a better way.
Ok, thanks, I'll revert it for 3.14.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists