[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140105000804.GD6003@zurbaran>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 01:08:04 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...ux.intel.com>,
Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: port100: fix leak of usb_device
Hi Alexey,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 12:08:05AM +0400, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> port100_probe() calls usb_get_dev(), but there is no usb_put_dev()
> in port100_disconnect(). The patch adds one.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/port100.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Patch applied to nfc-next, thanks.
I wonder if we really need to refcount the port100 USB interface, but
dev->in_urb does reference it for the whole driver life cycle, so I
think it all makes sense.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists