| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGz0_-2WsqMQLqyoPJ4ncoMJ7-XhYYt_cns7Mzq0CET0=1R4SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 13:48:23 +0100
From: Andreas Hollmann <hollmann@...tum.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Linux 3.12 spreads memory allocation across all NUMA nodes instead of
local allocation?
Hi,
it seems that my system (4-socket system) is
interleaving pages across all numa nodes.
The default should be local allocation on the current
node? (If I'm not wrong.)
I tried this out using the stream benchmark and pinned
a single thread to a single cpu with taskset. The memory
should be allocated on the numa node local to the CPU.
Instead the memory allocation is spread across all
numa nodes.
numa_balancing is disabled. It is however not possible
to detect it directly in user space. There is no sys entry.
Can I configure the default memory policy or is there
something wrong in the Kernel? I've never seen this
behavior as default before and I'm aware that you
enforce this allocation policy by using numactl --interleave=.
The system I'm using is a 4-Socket WestmereEX
system with 10 cores per socket in total 80 logical
CPUs and 256 GB memory.
Configuration:
$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-linux
root=UUID=294db3db-d278-4b20-9199-f5ac6926efaf rw console=tty0
console=ttyS0,115200 numa_balancing=disable nomodeset quiet
$ uname -a
Linux inwest 3.12.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Dec 20 19:39:00 CET 2013
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Here is how i produced the output:
wget www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/FTP/Code/stream.c
gcc -mcmodel=medium -O -DSTREAM_ARRAY_SIZE=100000000 stream.c -o stream.100M
taskset -c 0 ./stream.100M 1> /dev/null & watch -n 1 numastat -cp $!
Per-node process memory usage (in MBs) for PID 2055 (stream.100M)
Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Total
------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Huge 0 0 0 0 0
Heap 576 576 569 568 2289
Stack 0 0 0 0 0
Private 0 0 0 0 0
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total 576 576 569 568 2289
numactl -l taskset -c 0 ./stream.100M 1> /dev/null & watch -n 1 numastat -cp $!
Per-node process memory usage (in MBs) for PID 2333 (stream.100M)
Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Total
------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Huge 0 0 0 0 0
Heap 576 573 568 572 2289
Stack 0 0 0 0 0
Private 0 0 0 0 0
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total 576 573 568 572 2289
numactl -m 0 taskset -c 0 ./stream.100M 1> /dev/null & watch -n 1
numastat -cp $!
Per-node process memory usage (in MBs) for PID 2394 (stream.100M)
Node 0 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Total
------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Huge 0 0 0 0 0
Heap 2289 0 0 0 2289
Stack 0 0 0 0 0
Private 0 0 0 0 0
------- ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total 2289 0 0 0 2289
---
$ numactl -s 0 taskset -c 0 ./stream.100M
policy: default
preferred node: current
physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
cpubind: 0 1 2 3
nodebind: 0 1 2 3
membind: 0 1 2 3
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists