lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1538311.12EC6AbbfU@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 06 Jan 2014 02:07:19 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Jane Li <jiel@...vell.com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: Fix timer/workqueue corruption by protecting reading governor_enabled

On Friday, January 03, 2014 03:10:23 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:40:16PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 3 January 2014 14:47,  <jiel@...vell.com> wrote:
> > > From: Jane Li <jiel@...vell.com>
> > >
> > > When a CPU is hot removed we'll cancel all the delayed work items via
> > > gov_cancel_work(). Sometimes the delayed work function determines that
> > > it should adjust the delay for all other CPUs that the policy is
> > > managing. If this scenario occurs, the canceling CPU will cancel its own
> > > work but queue up the other CPUs works to run.
> > >
> > > Commit 3617f2(cpufreq: Fix timer/workqueue corruption due to double
> > > queueing) has tried to fix this, but reading governor_enabled is not
> > > protected by cpufreq_governor_lock. Even though od_dbs_timer() checks
> > > governor_enabled before gov_queue_work(), this scenario may occur. For
> > > example:
> > >
> > >  CPU0                                        CPU1
> > >  ----                                        ----
> > >  cpu_down()
> > >   ...                                        <work runs>
> > >   __cpufreq_remove_dev()                     od_dbs_timer()
> > >    __cpufreq_governor()                       policy->governor_enabled
> > >     policy->governor_enabled = false;
> > >     cpufreq_governor_dbs()
> > >      case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
> > >       gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
> > >        cpu0 work is canceled
> > >         timer is canceled
> > >         cpu1 work is canceled
> > >         <waits for cpu1>
> > >                                               gov_queue_work(*, *, true);
> > >                                                cpu0 work queued
> > >                                                cpu1 work queued
> > >                                                cpu2 work queued
> > >                                                ...
> > >         cpu1 work is canceled
> > >         cpu2 work is canceled
> > >         ...
> > >
> > > At the end of the GOV_STOP case cpu0 still has a work queued to
> > > run although the code is expecting all of the works to be
> > > canceled. __cpufreq_remove_dev() will then proceed to
> > > re-initialize all the other CPUs works except for the CPU that is
> > > going down. The CPUFREQ_GOV_START case in cpufreq_governor_dbs()
> > > will trample over the queued work and debugobjects will spit out
> > > a warning:
> > >
> > > WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x94/0xbc()
> > > ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x14
> > > Modules linked in:
> > > CPU: 1 PID: 1205 Comm: sh Tainted: G        W    3.10.0 #200
> > > [<c01144f0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf8) from [<c0111d98>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> > > [<c0111d98>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c01272cc>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x68)
> > > [<c01272cc>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x68) from [<c012737c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
> > > [<c012737c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c034c640>] (debug_print_object+0x94/0xbc)
> > > [<c034c640>] (debug_print_object+0x94/0xbc) from [<c034c7f8>] (__debug_object_init+0xc8/0x3c0)
> > > [<c034c7f8>] (__debug_object_init+0xc8/0x3c0) from [<c01360e0>] (init_timer_key+0x20/0x104)
> > > [<c01360e0>] (init_timer_key+0x20/0x104) from [<c04872ac>] (cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1dc/0x68c)
> > > [<c04872ac>] (cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x1dc/0x68c) from [<c04833a8>] (__cpufreq_governor+0x80/0x1b0)
> > > [<c04833a8>] (__cpufreq_governor+0x80/0x1b0) from [<c0483704>] (__cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.12+0x22c/0x380)
> > > [<c0483704>] (__cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.12+0x22c/0x380) from [<c0692f38>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x48/0x5c)
> > > [<c0692f38>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x48/0x5c) from [<c014fb40>] (notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x84)
> > > [<c014fb40>] (notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x84) from [<c012ae44>] (__cpu_notify+0x2c/0x48)
> > > [<c012ae44>] (__cpu_notify+0x2c/0x48) from [<c068dd40>] (_cpu_down+0x80/0x258)
> > > [<c068dd40>] (_cpu_down+0x80/0x258) from [<c068df40>] (cpu_down+0x28/0x3c)
> > > [<c068df40>] (cpu_down+0x28/0x3c) from [<c068e4c0>] (store_online+0x30/0x74)
> > > [<c068e4c0>] (store_online+0x30/0x74) from [<c03a7308>] (dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24)
> > > [<c03a7308>] (dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24) from [<c0256fe0>] (sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x180)
> > > [<c0256fe0>] (sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x180) from [<c01fec9c>] (vfs_write+0xbc/0x184)
> > > [<c01fec9c>] (vfs_write+0xbc/0x184) from [<c01ff034>] (SyS_write+0x40/0x68)
> > > [<c01ff034>] (SyS_write+0x40/0x68) from [<c010e200>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48)
> > >
> > > In gov_queue_work(), lock cpufreq_governor_lock before gov_queue_work,
> > > and unlock it after __gov_queue_work(). In this way, governor_enabled
> > > is guaranteed not changed in gov_queue_work().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jane Li <jiel@...vell.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c          |    2 +-
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |    6 +++++-
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h |    2 ++
> > >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>

Queued up for 3.14, thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ