[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140106191910.7155.38390934@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:19:10 +0900
From: Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@...panasonic.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Owada <owada.kiyoshi@...panasonic.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 056/185] mm: ensure get_unmapped_area() returns higher address than mmap_min_addr
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +0000
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@...panasonic.com>
> >
> > commit 2afc745f3e3079ab16c826be4860da2529054dd2 upstream.
> [...]
> > [bwh: Backported to 3.2:
> > As we do not have vm_unmapped_area(), make arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown()
> > calculate the lower limit for the new area's end address and then compare
> > addresses with this instead of with len. In the process, fix an off-by-one
> > error which could result in returning 0 if mm->mmap_base == len.]
>
> I'm dropping this as I have no good way to test the backport (it's not
> used on x86) and I didn't get any confirmation that it's right.
I'm sorry for delayed reply.
Your backport seems right.
Additionally, I've confirmed the problem is resolved by your backport patch.
Best regards,
Akira Takeuchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists