[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106110145.GM23772@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:01:45 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: sta2x11-mfd: use named constants for
pci_power_t values
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression pdev;
> @@
>
> pci_set_power_state(pdev,
> - 0
> + PCI_D0
> )
> // </smpl>
I'm happy with the code and that you used Coccinelle to discover the
issue, but I feel a little more explanation would be helpful to
readers.
Why is (pci_power_t __force) 0 better than 0?
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd.c
> index 0d42e40..5b72db0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd.c
> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static int sta2x11_mfd_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> int err;
>
> - pci_set_power_state(pdev, 0);
> + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists