[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106114902.GB30156@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:49:02 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: sta2x11-mfd: use named constants for
pci_power_t values
> > > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> > >
> > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > >
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression pdev;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > pci_set_power_state(pdev,
> > > - 0
> > > + PCI_D0
> > > )
> > > // </smpl>
> >
> > I'm happy with the code and that you used Coccinelle to discover the
> > issue, but I feel a little more explanation would be helpful to
> > readers.
> >
> > Why is (pci_power_t __force) 0 better than 0?
>
> I wasn't particularly attached to the cast, and I don't know if it is an
> issue. But in trying to understand the code, I found PCI_D0 more
> understandable than 0.
Well I don't want to waste any of your or my time, so I'll apply the
patch and add something along those lines to the commit message.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists