linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] x86 memtest: use NUMA_NO_NODE in do_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:45:59 +0300
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	x86@...nel.org, Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -next] x86 memtest: use NUMA_NO_NODE in do_one_pass()

Commit 68abcdf54742a ("mm/memblock: use WARN_ONCE when MAX_NUMNODES
passed as input parameter") has deprecated usage of MAX_NUMNODES
in __next_free_mem_range(). Pass NUMA_NO_NODE to for_each_free_mem_range().

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

---

 arch/x86/mm/memtest.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
index 8dabbed..1e9da79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void __init do_one_pass(u64 pattern, u64 start, u64 end)
 	u64 i;
 	phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
 
-	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
+	for_each_free_mem_range(i, NUMA_NO_NODE, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
 		this_start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_start, start, end);
 		this_end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_end, start, end);
 		if (this_start < this_end) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/