linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] ASoC/MFD: twl4030 codec local register cache removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140106161001.GJ30156@lee--X1>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:10:01 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ASoC/MFD: twl4030 codec local register cache
 removal

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 03:27:45PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > After the twl6040 codec, now it is time for the twl4030 codec driver to loose
> > it's local reg cache and let the MFD core's regmap to take care of the caching.
> 
> This all looks good to me - Lee/Samuel how do you want to handle this,
> are you OK with merging the MFD bits via ASoC or something else?

Are you planning on taking this in for v3.14? Only we're on -rc7 already.

It also depends how closely knit the MFD changes are to the ASoC ones.

Are they completely dependant? 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/