linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] Fix up a pointer-integer size mismatch warning in tps62360

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140106170028.GJ31886@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jan 2014 17:00:28 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Fix up a pointer-integer size mismatch warning in
 tps62360_probe()

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:40:28PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > you need to CC things to maintainers

> 	warthog>grep -i tps6 MAINTAINERS 
> 	warthog1>

> I cc'd Laxman who is the only person mentioned in the file.

> I cc'd you who is mentioned in the "regulator" section and who appears in
> sign-offs in the log.

But you didn't CC Liam who comaintains the subsystem and for me you used
a random address from signoffs on old commits (which you will doubtless
have noticed bounces) rather than the address in MAINTAINERS.  It looks
awfully like you only used signoffs here...

> There is no "regulator" list in the MAINTAINERS file.

Right, lkml is fine there - IIRC that was prompted by another patch I
noticed in the series, or it could just have been part of the
boilerplate response for these things.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)