[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106175338.GF30183@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:53:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
"containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) support
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:47:57PM +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
> > Yeah that's not accurate, nor desired I think, because you get into
> > horrible problems with hierarchies, do child groups belong to your RMID
> > or not?
>
> I'd rather not support a child group of a child group. Only groups off
> the root, and each group would be assigned an RMID when it's activated
> for monitoring.
Yeah, that's a complete non started for cgroups. Cgroups need to be
completely hierarchical.
So even the root group should represent all tasks; which if you fragment
RMIDs on child cgroups doesn't work anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists