[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106213349.GF28490@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:33:49 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Subject: Re: #pragma once?
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Does anyone have any objection to the use of "#pragma once" instead of
> the usual #ifndef-#define-...-#endif include guard? GCC, LLVM/clang,
> and the latest Sparse all support either method just fine. (I added
> support to Sparse myself.) Both have equivalent performance. "#pragma
> once" is simpler, and avoids the possibility of a typo in the defined
> guard symbol.
Does anybody know whether other static code analysis tools such as
Coverity can handle #pragma once?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists