[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140106223943.364444378@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:39:56 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, pjt@...gle.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 39/43] sched: Avoid throttle_cfs_rq() racing with period_timer stopping
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
commit f9f9ffc237dd924f048204e8799da74f9ecf40cf upstream.
throttle_cfs_rq() doesn't check to make sure that period_timer is running,
and while update_curr/assign_cfs_runtime does, a concurrently running
period_timer on another cpu could cancel itself between this cpu's
update_curr and throttle_cfs_rq(). If there are no other cfs_rqs running
in the tg to restart the timer, this causes the cfs_rq to be stranded
forever.
Fix this by calling __start_cfs_bandwidth() in throttle if the timer is
inactive.
(Also add some sched_debug lines for cfs_bandwidth.)
Tested: make a run/sleep task in a cgroup, loop switching the cgroup
between 1ms/100ms quota and unlimited, checking for timer_active=0 and
throttled=1 as a failure. With the throttle_cfs_rq() change commented out
this fails, with the full patch it passes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: pjt@...gle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131016181632.22647.84174.stgit@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/debug.c | 8 ++++++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -215,6 +215,14 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, in
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %d\n", "load_tg",
atomic_read(&cfs_rq->tg->load_weight));
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %d\n", "tg->cfs_bandwidth.timer_active",
+ cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth.timer_active);
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %d\n", "throttled",
+ cfs_rq->throttled);
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %d\n", "throttle_count",
+ cfs_rq->throttle_count);
+#endif
print_cfs_group_stats(m, cpu, cfs_rq->tg);
#endif
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1655,6 +1655,8 @@ static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_r
cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp = rq->clock;
raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
list_add_tail_rcu(&cfs_rq->throttled_list, &cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq);
+ if (!cfs_b->timer_active)
+ __start_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_b);
raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists