[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140106223902.349996992@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:38:45 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>,
Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@...tank.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 096/129] rbd: protect against concurrent unmaps
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
commit 82a442d239695a242c4d584464c9606322cd02aa upstream.
Make sure two concurrent unmap operations on the same rbd device
won't collide, by only proceeding with the removal and cleanup of a
device if is not already underway.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@...tank.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -5108,6 +5108,7 @@ static ssize_t rbd_remove(struct bus_typ
struct list_head *tmp;
int dev_id;
unsigned long ul;
+ bool already = false;
int ret;
ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &ul);
@@ -5135,11 +5136,12 @@ static ssize_t rbd_remove(struct bus_typ
if (rbd_dev->open_count)
ret = -EBUSY;
else
- set_bit(RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING, &rbd_dev->flags);
+ already = test_and_set_bit(RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING,
+ &rbd_dev->flags);
spin_unlock_irq(&rbd_dev->lock);
}
spin_unlock(&rbd_dev_list_lock);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0 || already)
goto done;
rbd_bus_del_dev(rbd_dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists